The rise of the registered report – Cancer Research UK

What do you consider the concept registered experiences may turn into the default means of publishing analysis?

The format is effectively suited to disciplines which lend themselves to testing hypotheses (confirmatory analysis).

Extra not too long ago, a number of journals together with Nature Strategies, Nature Communications and Scientific Reviews have opened the format to research aimed toward finishing up a comparability of the efficiency of established strategies or instruments. In that case, the experimental design and information evaluation plan is peer-reviewed and registered previous to information assortment however there is no such thing as a intent to check a speculation.

Finally, I would really like registered experiences to be on the radar of researchers throughout disciplines as a format which may be appropriate for them each time they’re getting down to check a speculation primarily based on present literature or evaluating strategies. Nonetheless, the format in its present kind is unlikely to be suited to analysis that’s purely exploratory.

Give us your prime ideas for researchers pondering of publishing on this means…

I’d strongly encourage researchers to seek the advice of the detailed information offered by the Heart for Open Science forward of laying down their analysis query and speculation, in addition to getting aware of journal particular tips for the format, as these might range.

When it comes to enhancing reproducibility and analysis integrity – do you suppose registered experiences shall be sufficient?

The format is one avenue to enhance reproducibility and analysis integrity, however it’s definitely not the one avenue and, as mentioned, it will not be appropriate in some instances.

With out going via the whole strategy of submitting a registered report back to a journal, pre-registering your research plan on a web site such because the Open Science Foundation, or on a recognised scientific trials registry when applicable, supplies rigour and accountability. Nonetheless, registration inside the context of the registered experiences helps with each integrity and reproducibility, as a result of the protocol is reviewed by different specialists previous to registration.

It’s equally essential to make sure that information and code linked to a printed research are shared amongst researchers and detailed experimental protocols made accessible on an open platform.

At Nature Communications, we additionally consider that making the publication course of clear is essential to make sure accountability of researchers and reviewers and thus, the change occurring between reviewers and researchers throughout the peer-review course of is revealed alongside all our articles.

Discover out extra about registered reports